Your resource for web content, online publishing
and the distribution of digital products.
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 

A Data-centric Approach to Class-specific Bias in Image Data Augmentation: Appendices A-L

DATE POSTED:August 31, 2024

:::info Authors:

(1) Athanasios Angelakis, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam - Data Science Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

(2) Andrey Rass, Den Haag, Netherlands.

:::

Table of Links Appendices Appendix A: Image dimensions (in pixels) off training images after being randomly cropped and before being resized

[32x32, 31x31, 30x30,

29x29, 28x28, 27x27,

26x26, 25x25, 24x24,

22x22, 21x21, 20x20,

19x19, 18x18, 17x17,

16x16, 15x15, 14x14,

13x13, 12x12, 11x11,

10x10, 9x9, 8x8,

6x6,5x5, 4x4, 3x3]

Appendix B: Dataset samples corresponding to the Fashion-MNIST segment used in training

Appendix C: Dataset samples corresponding to the CIFAR-10 segment used in training

Appendix D: Dataset samples corresponding to the CIFAR-100 segment used in training

Appendix E: Full collection of class accuracy plots for CIFAR-100

\ (a) The results in all figures employ official ResNet50 models from Tensorflow trained from scratch on the CIFAR-100 dataset with random crop data augmentation applied. All results in this figure are averaged over 4 runs. During training, the proportion of the original image obscured by the augmentation varies from 100% to 10%. We observe The vertical dotted lines denote the best test accuracy for every class.

\

\ (a) The results in all figures employ official ResNet50 models from Tensorflow trained from scratch on the CIFAR-100 dataset with random crop and random horizontal flip data augmentations applied. All results in this figure are averaged over 4 runs. During training, the proportion of the original image obscured by the augmentation varies from 100% to 10%. We observe The vertical dotted lines denote the best test accuracy for every class.

Appendix F: Full collection of best test performances for CIFAR100

Without Random Horizontal Flip:

\

\ With Random Horizontal Flip

\

Appendix G: Per-class and overall test set performances samples for the Fashion-MNIST + ResNet50 + Random Cropping + Random Horizontal Flip experiment

Appendix H: Per-class and overall test set performances samples for the CIFAR-10 + ResNet50 + Random Cropping + Random Horizontal Flip experiment

Appendix I: Per-class and overall test set performances samples for the Fashion-MNIST + EfficientNetV2S + Random Cropping + Random Horizontal Flip experiment

Appendix J: Per-class and overall test set performances samples for the Fashion-MNIST + ResNet50 + Random Cropping experiment

Appendix K: Per-class and overall test set performances samples for the CIFAR-10 + ResNet50 + Random Cropping experiment

Appendix L: Per-class and overall test set performances samples for the Fashion-MNIST + SWIN Transformer + Random Cropping + Random Horizontal Flip experiment

\

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.

:::

\