Empty

It’s September, and, like clockwork, Apple rolls out its latest iPhone lineup. The crowd goes wild, tech reviewers pull out their thesauruses to find new ways to say "incremental," and millions of us look at our perfectly functional devices with a twinge of guilt for not being on the cutting edge. But here's the real question—do we actually need a new iPhone every year? Or is Apple, and perhaps other tech giants, playing into a larger cycle of consumerism, cleverly disguised as innovation?

An Incremental Upgrade Carousel: Are We Really Moving Forward?

Let's break it down. Over the past few years, Apple has introduced changes that, while noticeable, aren’t exactly revolutionary. Take the iPhone 14 series in 2022. Sure, it introduced the Dynamic Island feature (on the Pro models), which is essentially a jazzed-up notification bar, and the A15 chip from the iPhone 13 was simply carried over to the base models. 

\Fast forward to the iPhone 15 in 2023, and we see more of the same: incremental improvements like the A17 Bionic chip in the Pro models, a switch to USB-C ports—mandated by EU regulations, mind you—and a slight camera upgrade on the Pro Max. 

\And now, the latest iPhone 16 (2024) doesn't break the mold either. While there are some exciting upgrades like the A18 Pro chip for better gaming and machine learning, a Camera Control button, and even slimmer bezels, it feels more like polishing the edges rather than pushing the limits. Yes, the new features are cool, but they’re more “nice-to-haves” than essentials.

\

The Illusion of Innovation and Apple’s Subtle Art of Selling Desire

The crux of the problem is that these yearly releases don’t feel all that different and do not fundamentally change how we use our devices. The average consumer isn’t going to notice the difference between the iPhone 15 and the iPhone 16 in their day-to-day life. What’s being sold as innovation often feels more like refinement, a way to perfect the existing design rather than reinvent it.

\ Interestingly, Apple’s brilliance doesn’t lie solely in its design or engineering—it lies in its ability to create desire. Every keynote is a masterclass in salesmanship, painting each new feature as a must-have, even when many of those features are marginal improvements. 

\ But step back for a second and think about it: when was the last time a new iPhone truly revolutionized your experience? If you’re like most users, the answer might be years ago. Yet the allure remains. Part of this is driven by the fear of missing out (FOMO)—the feeling that we might fall behind in our personal or professional lives if we don't have the latest tech. It's a cycle that perpetuates itself, and Apple knows this all too well.

\ This leads us to the BIG questions: 

• Is Apple focused on pushing the limits of technology? 
• Are they leading some diabolical mind control game where they hypnotize us into emptying our pockets every year? 

\It’s easy to argue the latter, given the minor nature of the upgrades we’ve seen in recent years.

A Philosophical Fork in the Road: Innovation or Corporate Strategy?

This brings us to the heart of the matter. Shouldn’t innovation be about fundamentally changing how we interact with technology, rather than introducing slightly better versions of last year’s model? Apple has mastered the art of making us feel like we need to upgrade, but when you zoom out, it’s hard not to see a bigger corporate strategy at play.

\Let’s talk about what real innovation looks like. Remember when Face ID came out? That was a game-changer, a feature that fundamentally changed how people interacted with their phones. Or take the introduction of touchscreen on smartphones—a true leap forward in user experience. These types of advancements, which require new hardware and deep engineering, are more worthy of an upgrade. But does a titanium frame or a slightly better telephoto lens move the needle in the same way? Not so much.

\If Apple truly prioritized innovation, wouldn't we be better served by major, groundbreaking releases? Wouldn’t Apple keynotes be much more exciting if we knew something revolutionary was on the horizon, rather than the yearly parade of "faster," "lighter," and "with more megapixels"?

The Consumerism Cycle: Keeping Up With the iJoneses

At its core, Apple’s yearly release cycle isn’t just about innovation—it’s about consumerism. By constantly pushing out new products, Apple taps into our collective fear of falling behind. It's the modern-day equivalent of “keeping up with the Joneses,” but instead of a shiny new car, it's the latest iPhone with a slightly better camera zoom.

\Here’s the kicker: Most of the advancements Apple touts could be delivered through software updates. Take a feature like improved low-light photography—many of these enhancements can be driven by software. Yet, Apple locks these upgrades behind new hardware, nudging you to part with your hard-earned cash.

The Financial Toll of Keeping Up With Apple’s Pace

Apple has created a financial treadmill that many consumers feel pressured to stay on. Think about it: in just three years, the iPhone 14, iPhone 15, and now iPhone 16 have hit the market, each with a price tag that often exceeds $1,000. And if you’re upgrading every year, or even every other year, that’s a huge financial burden over time. Let’s be clear: iPhones are expensive. For many, buying the latest iPhone isn't just a purchase—it's a major financial decision.

\ The iPhone 16 Pro starts at $999, and the Pro Max reaches $1,599. Is a slightly bigger screen, a new camera button, and marginally better battery life really worth that price tag? More importantly, are those changes worth upgrading from a perfectly functional iPhone 14 or 15? That’s debatable. But, as already stated, Apple’s marketing is designed to make you feel otherwise—to make you believe that without the latest features, you’re falling behind.\

HOW ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL COST OF “NEW”?

\Every time we toss aside a perfectly functional iPhone for the next shiny model, we’re contributing to a growing problem. According to The United Nations, e-waste is the fastest-growing waste stream globally, with much of it coming from discarded electronics like smartphones.

\

A Possible Path Forward 

There’s a scenario where your current iPhone continues to receive cutting-edge features through software updates, allowing you to stay current without needing to replace the hardware annually. And this isn’t just a pie-in-the-sky idea either. If you look at Apple’s current software strategy, we already see the company supporting iPhones with updates for five or six years. The potential is there; it just needs to be expanded.

\ If Apple adopted a more sustainable model—releasing phones every two to three years, and prioritizing software updates in the interim—they could set a new standard in the tech world. Imagine the ripple effect:

\ Apple, one of the most influential companies in the world, leading a charge towards sustainability by adopting a more measured, thoughtful release cycle. It could push other tech giants to rethink their own strategies, and help shift the collective mindset away from this "throwaway culture" that has become so pervasive. \

At the end of the day, the question is simple: Do we want a new iPhone every year, or do we want better iPhones when they truly matter? Apple, it’s time to think bigger.

\